ABDUL HAMEED versus NASIM AKHTAR
Order O XXIII, R 3 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 2 (a) The Civil Procedure Code Appeal XLIII of the appeal to CPC was the plaintiff's submission that the offer of settlement by the defendant during the cross examination was submitted. In light of the defendant's motion, the trial was compromised only when the trial court rejected the settlement, while the lower appellate court stated the same correctness as the supporting motion given by the defendant. The answer to the last question was not answered during the course of the investigation. Such advice cannot be interpreted in the meaning of section 2 (a) of the Contracting Act, 1872, which is intended to alleviate the pressure placed on the underlying party by a problem. The appellate court had dealt with the material while exercising its jurisdiction when passing judgment and decree, which was set aside and the trial court's order and order restored.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Makli lawyer
