Find a Lawyer

AACHER versus DUR MUHAMMAD USTO

Sections 8 and 9 of the West Pakistan Waqf Property Ordinance 1959 and the West Pakistan Waqf Property Ordinance (XXI of 1959), Sections 6, 7 and 8 of the Waqf Property Occupation Failure to hand over the disputed property to the beneficiaries are actually their Created by the foregoing authorities in favor of the respondents and the occupation of the land occupied under the provisions of Martial Law Regulation No. 195 64 195, the decision of the dispute between the parties was not finally transferred to the vacant possession by the Supreme Court. has been. The respondents and the land were either occupied by the heirs or the constitutional petition was tiled by the respondents to restore possession by the High Court. The High Court granted the request and directed the authority to do so. Transfer the property to the respondent. And other properties, which the beneficiaries / original owners eventually found entitled to, where appellants or any of them still insist that any person be included in such land or part thereof. Has been asserted, that he or any of them will be free to follow the affected administrator. The High Court ordered the extension of relief in terms of sections 8 and 9 of the Sindh Waqf Property Ordinance, 1979, the Supreme Court directed the Land Reforms authorities to properly deal with their respective rights and entitlements, as This includes the required rights. Harris, who was also an appellate order of the High Court, had amended it and accordingly allowed the appeal. jobs for advocates from Renala Khurd lawyer