RAMESH UDESHI versus THE STATE
Criminal charges were the Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 409/34 of the Prevention of Corruption (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) bail, The Secretary, while acting as land, use, the Secretary of the Treasury, while ignoring the qualified Chief Secretary, submitted a summary directly to the Chief Minister, the accused was a government employee working in Grade 20 and was not charged. Was. Against the fact that the allotment received any beneficial benefits / benefits from the land allotment, it was alleged that he was sent to judicial custody and no longer needed for investigative purposes and that he Being a civil servant was not likely to be felonious or tampered with. The evidence against him, which was documentary in nature, was similar to that of the accused. The accused whose pre-arrest bail was granted. In case of involvement in this case, the accused's case, which requires further investigation, was also admitted on bail. had gone
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Sehwan lawyer
