MUHAMMAD AMJAD versus REHANA KAUSAR
Ordinance 1959 Sections 2 (e) (i), 13 and 15 (6) of the West Pakistan Civil Rent Restriction Second Appeal Schedule for a specific performance suit between the landlord and the tenant, tenant and father of the landlord effect. The lease agreement or lease note between the parties, nor the tenant paid any rent to the landlord; the landlord rent controller also did not hand over the landlord who had the landlord and tenant relationship between the parties. Was found to be absent. The eviction request filed by the Landlord Appellate Court reversed the rent controller's finding and allowed the tenant to request that the tenant direct the evacuation of the shop in question. According to the terms of the definition of the landlord and the tenant, there was no conformity to the contract of sale in the West Pakistan Rental Restriction Ordinance, 1959 between the landlord and the tenant's father. Ice was present and the evidence proved that the defendant was neither the landlord nor the tenant of the appellant's shop, the order passed by the lower appellate court in the dispute was set aside and the rent controller restored. Which was allowed under the circumstances to appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Gawadar lawyer