DR. KHURSHEED BHUTTO versus CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY
Section 10 and 11 Special Relief Act (Constitution of 1877), Article 42 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Request Allocation of Citizen Services Residential Quarter Allotment to the applicant on payment of monthly rent authority canceling the application for residential quarters Applicants were challenged in the constitutional petition for notification order for notice to the petitioner for any reason, retaining the order of adjournment especially shows that the allotment of quarters in favor of the applicants was on a temporary basis and that That the applicants had to vacate the circles if needed. The Authority issued notices against the applicants / allies, giving them time to vacate the quarters, and due to lack of accommodation for their officials, the applicants were prosecuted because the applicants They could not claim only temporary housing allotment. In their favor, any petitioner's argument that no cause was taken notice of him before the cancellation of his allotment and that the principles of natural justice were violated, was overturned. That the applicants had no legal right to a hearing before the cancellation. There was no absolute right to issue showcase notices before cancellation of their allotment and allotment. Orders to cancel the allotment of approved quarters after giving ample time to vacate quarters did not interfere with the High Court in the constitutional petition. Which is otherwise. Was not manageable
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Garh Maharaja lawyer