MUHAMMAD NADEEM versus THE STATE
Article 2 302 // evidence The parties to the testimony had deep enmity, and the prosecution's witnesses were envious of the accused. Lies cannot be denied. The recovery of the three vacancies was of no avail as the prosecution's weapon was not recovered from the accused. Prosecutors could not identify who fired first and only three of the accused were injured. There is no mention of the seat and the absence of any witnesses' testimony on the incident at the time of the shooting was limited when the victim was killed. The investigating officer said that during the course of the investigation, no evidence was found linking the accused to the Commission of Crime. Where the case of murder and death was involved in the murder case, a very close scrutiny of the evidence is required, with the former hostile to the prosecution and none other than the statements of the prosecution witnesses. Anecdotal evidence was not available that completely naming the innocent and then changing the position made the trial suspicious and the benefit of the doubt should go to the accused, the prosecution failed. In order to prove the case against the accused, the sentence and sentence they received was set aside and they were acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Bahawalnagar lawyer