ALLAH WADHAYO versus WALI MUHAMAMD
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Sections 200, 203, 403 and 439 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (II 1947), Section 5 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 161 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 132 Autofreeze, independent offender principle complaint review jurisdiction, the complainant's practice was first filed by the complainant, withdrawing on the basis that there was a friendly settlement between the parties. After the complaint was withdrawn, another complaint was filed by the complainant under the same provisions of the law. The trial court, based on the same facts, declared that the complaint would be valid and dismissed the accused and the complainant was barred from filing another complaint. On the same facts the second complaint was filed under Section 3403, CRPC. And Article 132 of the Constitution. In Pakistan (1973) and on the principle of autofree, the second complaint was dismissed by the proper and proper order of the trial court, which could not interfere with the review by the High Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Doaaba lawyer