Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Sections 364, 365A, 148, 149, 353, 324 and 149 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13D Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Sections 239 and 234 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 XXVII), Pressure on the Activities of Sections 32 and 13 (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), Section 3 and 4 Transfer of the case from the Special Court to the Counter-Terrorism Court The special judge against the accused, who had sought the transfer of the case to the court, was tried before the Anti-Terrorism Court under sections 646464, 565A, 148 and 149, PPC Mills. S after pressure Special Judge, terrorist activities faced trial in another case, I was registered against them. Section 353, 324 and 149 and Section 13D, 1965 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, the offenses under which the suspects faced trial before the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 were separated and separated from the crimes in the pending case. Were. Under the Special Courts of Terrorism Activities (Special Courts) Act, 1975, the history, conviction, place of crime, witnesses, evidence, counsel and FI forms of the commission of the two cases were different from each other even as its name. Complainant / Applicant Did Not Move to Witness Calender Request for Transfer of Case was dismissed advocate from Kandhkot lawyer