In view of the value of the evidence of Sections 9B, 34 and 35 of the Drug Controls Act 1997, the complainant inspector who issued the statement, who headed the raiding party, was arrested on the spot. One kilogram of heroin was recovered, which another member confirmed. The raiding party's complainant was not cross-examined by the defense at the point of heroin recovery from the accused, which proved that the chemical Examiner in his report declared the material recovered from the accused as heroin, mentioning it in the provincial Narcotics has been tested. The laboratories were announced by a notification to be the Federal Narcotics Testing Laboratories and the Chemical Examiner and the Assistant Chemical Examiner were appointed as Official Analyst under section 35 of the Chemical Examiner's Control of Narcotic Substances Act 1997 Should be understood. Therefore, in this case, it was submitted that, under the section, there was a report under consideration.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
