Find a Lawyer

KANEEZ BEGUM versus KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORPORATION

The meaning of the case metaphor for the Section 1 fatal accident charge and what it meant was that his son died at 11 years of age due to a power shock when he raised an electric pole. Was. The plaintiff for the electric company claimed that her son's death was due to negligence, default and wrongdoing of the company that failed to take reasonable steps to address the risk on the road. The location of the death was not ruled out by the company Ounce as proof of the son's death, cause of death, and in the circumstances, the company turned to show that it was due to his negligence. Not that the death was due to the plaintiff because in a general rule the defendant's negligence had to be proved and it was not for him. The defendant has to prove it wrong as well, but in such cases when the real cause of death is fully kept in the knowledge of the defendant, then the hassle can be avoided with the help of the application of the law of reasoning. jw.org en (This explains itself) The cause of death of the deceased was the acquisition of electricity from the standing electric poles and it was known to the company that electricity could be damaged and even the life of a person. Could have been when the company was careful and performed its duty. Diligently, the accident could have been avoided had the plaintiff been able to prove the accident, but could not prove how it happened so that the defendant could not produce any evidence to show the fact that he was negligent and that he was not responsible. It is badly damaged. It failed to show that the plaintiff's lawsuit against the company was complete pakistani advocates Washuk lawyer