Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HANIF KHAN versus THE STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 307 and 334 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Islamic Sanctions Laws Enforcement Act (IX of 1974), sections 3 and 5, prove that the inquiry sheets and the inquiry reports of the injured and the accused were not substantiated and exhibited. Gone. The prosecutor who supported the fact that the FIR was filed on the spot after the initial investigation and that this report of Franzik Expert was neither presented for exhibition nor presented to the accused. Coincidence because the evidence against the accused was dismissed because failure to establish injury sheets and prove inquiry reports was not fatal in the prosecution's case, especially when the post-mortem report was legally proven by a doctor's examination It was not necessary to prove the report of the forensic expert presenting the same author. It cannot be said that the number of complainant and accused parties members and the fact that the shooting incident was at least attributed to the green persons, based on the evidence of the prosecution, was denied. There will be no injuries from a particular point. The dispute is that the legal prosecution's story was falsified by circumstantial evidence. The weapons were recovered from the suspects with the fact that according to the forensic expert's report, guns were fired from two cartridges which were recovered from the accused's act. Neither the property itself came into the realm nor The person in favor of the accused is a person who reduces the crime, which shows that he is sentenced to death, the Shariah court decision was not justified and accordingly he was punished. law firms from Mustang lawyer