GULFAM versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 324, 353, 148, 149, 337d, 337A, 337, 302 and 109 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13D bail, the prosecution did not have any free and anecdotal evidence available that could link the accused to the crime against him, the co-accused had committed confession before the police and disclosed the accused because of the co-accused The statement of the co-accused could not be said as evidence. The evidence against the accused and the evidence of the co-accused had no significance in the eyes of the law; no role was specified by the accused from which he could be considered as the other participant. Could show the way to associate with the accused, one of the co-accused who was granted bail, later accused of being acquitted, even if he was absconding on bail. If he had no knowledge of the pending case against him in court, he was alleged to have surrendered himself to the court by filing a petition. In addition, it is believed that the accused deliberately refused to appear in the trial court case against the accused seeking further inquiry, he was admitted on bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Chak Sawara lawyer