ABDUL SHAKOOR versus THE STATE
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 457 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Sections 342 and 164 found evidence only against the accused during the interrogation of the evidence. The alleged judicial confession is a crime, which made its statement under Section 342, CRPC. I denied all the allegations. Against this and even denied that the alleged judicial confession was voluntarily granted by him. There was no question of whether his confession was true or under pressure, the accused was in police custody for a period of five to six days. Prior to the recording of his alleged confession, the accused had alleged that he had been treated harshly and alleged that he had been tortured and alleged that the accused had been withdrawn. And it has not been endorsed in any other case in this case and is the result of abuse. En The defendant could not be safely relied on for a stool conviction, jw.org ur property was not recovered from the accused nor was the complainant nor any other witness claimed to be present at the time of the incident. ? Identification of accused by the complainant is not credible The prosecution has failed to link the accused with any evidence, the trial court adjourned the sentence and sentenced
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Sukkur lawyer