ABDUL QADIR ISMAIL versus STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN
Constitution Pakistan 1973 Article 212 (3) The employer's request for leave to appeal the sole grievance was that the service tribunal's unconstitutional decision had the effect that during the hearing, the representative of the department openly submitted that the income The tax appellants will be recovered from them, which is based on the misconception of the fact that they have neither a consultant for the employer bank nor a representative of the employer bank during the proceedings before the service tribunal. That the income tax will be paid. Employees, with the consent of the parties to the Supreme Court, referred the service tribunal to the Service Tribunal after hearing from the parties to investigate this question in the light of the affidavit of an employee of an employer's bank. The Tribunal deems it appropriate and if it is established that such statement has been referred to the representatives of the Department, to the dismay of the Employer Bank, the observations of the Service Tribunal Shah should be deleted or else the Salvation will remain intact.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Ghotki lawyer