MUHAMMAD HAROON versus RAZIA BEGUM
Section 42 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), the discovery of facts by both the courts under section 161 controversial modifications was confirmed ten years before the plaintiff filed a fraudulent charge. Hopefully, it was hopelessly banned from time to time, and the allegations of fraud were not only vague and debunked, but also baseless, for any judicial error or evidence that was ignored or misrepresented. , Was indicated in the concluding conclusions made by the plaintiff. On the question of fact, the two courts below decided against them.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Haveli Kahuta lawyer