BASHIR AHMAD versus MAQSOOD MAI
Rule 15 and 21 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913, Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O III, RA and OAXIII, R 3 suits, declaring cases in favor of premature dismissal by the daughter of premature dismissal Was exported. One shopkeeper and one of his appointed attorneys challenged the other vendor's order that he was not present on the date of recording the statements, without his approval, that the decree was not binding on any of the statements. The suit was ordered. The shopkeepers and their advice and nothing else was on record that the seller had withdrawn his lawyer from his lawyer appointed by the lawyer who had authorized the two vendors to deal with the other party; It was normal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Poonch lawyer
