AHMAD BAKHSH versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB
Civil Procedure Code Order XVIIA XVII, R3 and Section 115 of the CPC Adjustment Act (I of 1877), dismissing the trial and trial theoretical jurisdiction for the elimination of section 42 evidence, the plaintiff's exception for one reason Failure to present evidence or, on other occasions, he was left to the trial court, with no alternative, but to demand the delivery of the OXVII, R 3, CPC, and the trial court's order Retained in appeal orders. Review cannot be interfered with by any illegal interference or material misconduct.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Taunsa sharif lawyer
