Find a Lawyer

IMAMUDDIN versus STATE

Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) in section 497 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 337A (II) and 148 bail, in the grant of reason for not mentioning the accused's name in the FIR What was further explained was the complainant's statement filed after the FIR's testimony, which was described under Section 161, was recorded immediately after the recording of the FLR under the CCPC. , Was thoroughly confused in his statement that the accused's name was not transferred to the FIR. Nor did the FLR provide any details regarding the defendant's outstanding characteristics; it was misunderstood that the incident happened overnight, in light of the FIR, as well as statements of the prosecution's witnesses and parties. Was also revealed. There can be no question of caste, misidentification, the accused did not come to the court with clear hands as he did not disclose his bail plea or during arguments. Already two bail pleas were filed, the accused accused of associating with the accused with the co-accused during the odd hours of the night, before the fee suggested that he was private in the commission of the crime. Admittedly it has no overt act. It was claimed that he was entitled to bail. In the circumstances the law was not enforceable power of attorney advocate Theing Jattan More lawyer