SABIR versus THE STATE
Sections 302 (c), 324 and 148 Criminal Code (v. 1898), Section 161, the testimony of the suspect was the benefit of the suspect as a co-accused already released by the police, as their names revealed. Were. Despite the arrest of the accused, nothing was recovered from their homes, but the prosecution's evidence was not proved by any independent evidence, therefore, during the cross-examination, the prosecution's testimony was of no importance. It is stated that his statement of the prosecution's testimony cannot, therefore, be relied upon to seek co-operation from section 161. There is no convincing evidence on the CCP's statement that the accused had committed the crime. Had shared a common objection with fellow commissioners. The High Court rejected the testimony of the injured witness and did not qualify it for compensation by the trial court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from South Wazirstan lawyer
