Find a Lawyer

ABDUR REHMAN versus STATE

Pakistan Panel Code Section 302 (b) / 34 praised the evidence as revealed by the FIR that it was built on the basis of speculation, gossip, rumors and imagination and that the prosecution had established the purpose of the incident. I was unsuccessful. This extra-judicial confession by the accused was irrespective of the crime, date, time, place, purpose and details of the incident and did not deserve any credibility and the suspension of the carbine was postponed until 34/35. The day was unforgettable as no crime was recovered from the occasion The police made all the recovery to strengthen the case and they were useless as a proof of what was last seen. The witness submitted that the complainant did not even present. Before there was an incredible witness who unearthed maps of not being an expert in the police profession, the E-Police had together formed various documents to link the accused to the commission of the crime. The necessary links were missing in relation to the evidence and evidence, in this case real doubts arose, which was of benefit. It is necessary to extend the accused according to which the accused was acquitted advocate for immigration from Hub Inds Estate lawyer