Find a Lawyer

SHAMA AKRAM versus MUHAMMAD LATIF

Section 265 F & 540 Panel Code (XLV of 1860) of Criminal Code (CRPC), Rule 302/324/148/149 has the equal right to present evidence to a witness's returnee if the cause of human error If a piece of evidence already on record was not brought, it can be allowed to conclude if the prosecution's clauses were not closed by the court under section 404040, the CRPC testified. Extensive powers of summoning were given, which was necessary to decide the case only if the court found that the statement of the witness was necessary for a fair decision of the case, then the court Call it out, but when the court came to the conclusion that the statement was not necessary for the mere verdict. In this case, it was then the court's discretion whether or not to call a witness under Section 540, CR PC, if the statement that was already listed as necessary evidence would help the court in pursuing justice. Will The trial cannot be pressed on the one hand under the pretext of filling millions, such a statement must be made on the record for a just verdict, denying the trial court's ruling was illegal and unlawful, especially But when the evidence of the prosecution was not yet closed under section 265F, the CRPC may present in evidence that any verbal or documentary evidence the prosecutor wants to present is what he wants. Was, the prosecution could not be denied before the trial was closed; after the conclusion of the prosecution, the evidence, it was the duty of the court to examine Must prepare for further evidence of his decision or not power of attorney advocate Jatoi lawyer