Find a Lawyer

QAIMUDDIN versus MUHAMMAD HANIF

Special Relief Act 1877 Section 12 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O IX, R 9 Reinstatement of the case The restoration of the case for illegal proceedings was decided for the plaintiff's evidence, but neither the plaintiff nor his lawyer appeared in court. The wind and the lawsuit was dropped. Illegal prosecutor failed to appear because of his illness and his lawyer was out of the position as he was appearing in another case when the plaintiff / applicant stated that he would not seek any adjournment and this In the interest of justice and fairness, the matter should be decided on merit instead of closing it at the technical ground, but at the altar of technocrats justice cannot be offered and the matter can still be decided on facts. In which evidence should provide the plaintiff with a chance to decide the case. Claiming good discrimination after recording evidence in the interest of justice would not be sufficient to refuse to allow the plaintiff / applicant to present their evidence, not only to close the evidence but also to deny the technical grounds. list of supreme court advocates from Mangowal lawyer