INAYAT BIBI versus FAQIR MUHAMMAD
West Pakistan Redemption and Mortgage Lenders Act 1964 Section 10 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 148 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Resolving mortgaged land without paying mortgage money, interest of applicant In effect, in the interest of the foregoing effective defendant, the property mortgagor in dispute in favor of the foreclosure was in the possession of the land collector at the request of the applicant, the property was redeemed without paying the mortgage, while the mortgage remained = Appeal was allowed by the defendant The order of the Commissioner and Collector was set aside The Board of Revenue accepted the review and S order reinstated the High Court, was approved by the Board of Revenue in the constitutional jurisdiction to set aside the order of the Commissioner. Restoration Accurate and Mortgage Restoration Land Act, 1964 was applicable for the maintenance mortgage budget. Such provisions were not applicable in connection with the mortgage for the summation of Modi, in which the limitation period prescribed under Article 148 of the Limitation Act 1908 Was terminated and the same shall not be considered a contributory mortgage, whereas the law was not properly applied in approving the mortgage and the order was without legal authority and It was rightly declared that the High Court order passed by the High Court did not hurt. The Supreme Court denied any legal weakness, leave of appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Talhur lawyer