MESSRS SHAHEEN AIRPORT SERVICES versus NAFEES-UL-HASSAN SIDDIQUI
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii) and 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art: 185 (3) man Employees service Request for a termination of service dismissed from the employee's employment The basis of ineligible and poor performance However, the Labor Court dismissed the employee's complaint request, because the Labor Appellate Tribunal did not recognize the employees' appeal before it was granted and the order was upheld by the High Court, the employees argued on the matter. The employee was not a laborer, the job description was never challenged by the employer and he made it clear that he was performing the labor appellate tribunal manual and the High Court correctly determined that The employee was not called a manager or supervisor. \ Any work done under and by definition of workmanship was not committed by any unlawful act or irregularity The order passed by the High Court was free from any legal weakness. The Supreme Court intervened in the High Court's leave order. Refused
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Ambela lawyer