Find a Lawyer

MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED versus ABDUL JABBAR

Article 25A of the Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Sections 5 and 14 of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) was a bank employee who was dismissed from employment by a court respondent in connection with the industrial dispute delay. The dismissal order was suspended in the civil suit. And the same was decided by the trial court during the hearing of the appeal before the appellate court, under which the bank employees were given the right to refer to the Labor Court, the appeal was withdrawn and a complaint was filed. The defendant but the Labor Appellate Tribunal overturned the Labor Court's finding and the High Court was retained under the jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution, the application was granted and the order approved by the Labor Court restored. The defendant's reply was that the respondent was. Appeal of the complaint was banned because of the decision passed by the Supreme Court in April 1987 Appeal was withdrawn on 12 11 1987, before which the decision of the Supreme Court was presented before it. Was done under duty but did not pass any order on it, the delay in this case was also attributable. The appellate court, where the order to dismiss the respondents has been approved, nor by any competent person, is it a matter of late condolences. The Labor Court did not take any illegal action, nor did it deny or take serious action. And so on. Related reservations Supreme Court refuses to interfere in Labor court's order and dismisses the High Court's leave for appeal criminal advocate from Ahmed pur Sial lawyer