ALI BAKHSH versus EJAZ KARIMI
Sindh Tenant Limitation Ordinance 1979 Sections 15 (2) (ii), (vii) and 21 of the landlord's default in payment of rent required by the landlord were allegedly defaulted to the landlord before December 1992. Was charged, but the rent controller only considered the default. Without giving a reason for the period before July, 1994 without giving a reason, the tenant also failed to provide any respectable or reasonable basis for maintaining the personal need or need of the landlord. No need to reveal or disclose the name. Tenants who were occupying other shops that were rented by the landlord and no provision of the law required the landlord to state his preference or preference for a particular shop when he was in other shops. Was also the owner of False evidence on rent control evidence is based on false statements and false principles and contrary to the principles, regardless of the evidence and material available on record. In response to a question of default and personal need, the matter was set aside on the pre-decision remand.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Sialkot lawyer