NAZIR versus STATE
The appreciation of the Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 (c) evidence was not only to raise the case against the accused and to make ineffective firing, as well as his other accomplices, who were acquitted by the trial court, who fired and killed the victim. Had played a central role. The rifle was attributed to the original suspect, who was a fugitive in the case. The eyewitnesses were not only deeply involved with the deceased, but they had deep enmity with the accused, and their statements were denied by the trial court's two accused. No weapon of crime was recovered to the accused, nor can any vacant location be shown that the weapon allegedly carried by the accused was used during this time. The medical evidence of the incident did not contribute to the prosecution's version, but contradicts the same litigation claim regarding its possibility. No documentary evidence was supported on the file of the complaining party's article on the land in dispute, the effect of police opinion on the innocence of all the accused in the case could not be excluded altogether, on the benefit of the suspect in the circumstances. Was acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Hassan Abdal lawyer