REDI GUL versus THE STATE
Section 25A & 38 (3A) of Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition The Labor Court failed to produce evidence despite the employees' submission of bank employees to the Labor Court. Provided. Closed before the Labor Appellate Tribunal, the bank filed a labor court revision ag4inst order which stopped the proceedings before the Labor Court and adjourned the case without issuing a notice to the employee and recording the record, the employee said. That cannot be ordered. The employee provided under Section 38 (3A) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance has been granted without the opportunity of a hearing; the Judicial Labor Appellate Tribunal did not modify or amend the Labor Court-approved, but For this he only had a fixed date and he also assured the bank to obtain a record of persuasive consultation that he would not do so before the tribunal causing any delay and adding arguments to the postponement date for damaging the parties. The High Court has asked the Tribunal to hear arguments from the postponement date and to resolve the matter within the stipulated time. Yep.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Kohat lawyer