COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX. ZONE-B, LAHORE versus MUHAMMAD SARWAR KHAN
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Sections 13 and 111 Unexpected Investment Income Tax Ordinance, Section 111 (2) (c) of 1979 Attentional Retention of Income Tax Authorities fined the assets of the Assessment Year 1977 for 78 Income The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, imposed under section 111 (2) (c) of the Tax Ordinance, 1979, rejected the order of the Income Tax Authorities, stating that the provisions of section 111 were not retroactive because the penalties imposed under the Act. Not as per the provisions of Section 13 (1) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, allegedly concealing and furnishing inaccurate details; Many years before the Arif occurred at a place where no other provision of the Ordinance was fined, the Tribunal held that the provisions of section 111 (2) (c) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 were naturally Did not back down. And, the correct answer was positively answered
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Kot Bunglow lawyer
