Find a Lawyer

PIR BUX versus MATLOOB KHAN

Full support for appeal against section 302/34 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), section 417 constitution of Pakistan (1973), section 185 against the accused in the case of the injured by the High Court version presented by the victim in the FIR. Was done The ocular evidence presented by the prosecution's witnesses, which was further strengthened by the medical evidence, was not properly appreciated by the High Court and its findings were not read and recorded on non-examination of the evidence which was serious. Was responsible for and responsible for the rules and illegal activities. The trial court's findings of conviction and sentencing were not only convincing, but they were based on reasonable definition of evidence and were influenced by the belief that the accused's immunity was excluded by the High Court, and against it. The trial court had sentenced and sentenced. However, the section B of B was taken advantage of, CC Percy, however, the accusation was authorized to appeal according to the same sentence. tax advocates from Lodhran lawyer