TAMOUR SHAH versus THE STATE
Sections 11, 12A13 and 15 of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973, XXIII of the Industrial Relations Ordinance (Section XXIII of 1969), the Tribunal's jurisdiction over the petition filed by the employees of the newspaper, the Tribunal, in the constitutional petition The newspaper's administration was allowed before the High Court to pay its employees, as determined by the Tribunal's Fourth Wage Award Order, in the case that, without determining the receipt of that amount, the Tribunal had mistakenly assumed that the industrial The powers under section 51 (1) of the Relations Ordinance, 1969, were set up to implement the decision of the wage board which found the newspaper. Wage rates were determined in relation to the land where the amount owed to the employer was determined in the award / decision. The wage board, therefore, did not require further determination and the Tribunal was able to issue a direct direct ion, the High Court, to recover the amount owed against employers under section 51 (1) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 It was not correct to observe that the amount in respect of which the proceedings were initiated was not determined, under which the wage board's decision was properly informed. The employer was bound and within the jurisdiction and jurisdiction of the tribunal to enforce the same decision passed by the High Court, and the order of the tribunal to be enforced was restored.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Jalozai lawyer