Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD JAVED versus CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE BENCH, LAHORE

The Customs Act, 1969, section 168 (2), 156 (1) (89) (90), 2 (5) and 196 of the High Court found that the confiscation of the items responsible for confiscating the appellate tribunal found that section 156 ( 1) (90) and, rather, section 156 (1) (89) was attracted to the matter because the collector tribunal erroneously applied that it was discovered when the goods in the border belt were brought to Pakistan. And was not notified at this time. Under section 2 (5) of the Customs Act, 1969, this case could not be covered under section 156 (1) (89) - the import or export of certain goods prohibited by the ratification of the Act. Will not be equal. The order of smuggling must be stated either in column 9 or by the federal government under section 2 (5) of the Customs Act, 1969. famous high court advocate from Diamer lawyer