TASSADUQ ABBAS BUKHARI versus CHAIRMAN, APPEAL COMMITTEE, PUNJAB-I, PAKISTAN BAR COUNCIL, ISLAMABAD
Punjab Association of Business of Bar Association, Memorandum of Association Rules 1981 R 60 Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act (XXXV of 1973), Section 13 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Bar Association Justification of Election Voting Instead of a cross-mark on the ballot paper by tick by mark, the Executive Committee of the Provincial Bar Council accepted the election petition filed by the respondent candidate, resulting in the votes of both candidates being equal. One of the respondents' vote did not include the \ cross \ mark because the Bar Association / Memorandum Association Rule 60 of the Shin Rules 1981 Business of Business of Punjab Rules was also required, so the defendant was defeated by a vote even though under the provisions of the Business Rules of the Bar Association / Memorandum of Association Rules, Punjab Rule 60 of 1981 At 60, everyone who exercises their right to vote must cross-kill against a candidate of their choice, yet there is no provisional provision in the rule where a voter has voted against a candidate of their choice. The crossput was not marked, but simply marked "tick" against the name of your preferred candidate. Any number two to invalidate the ballot paper has indicated the voter's intention in favor of his / her candidate and has to look and consider the voter's intention when deciding the authenticity or wrongness of the ballot paper. Just because the Bar Association / Memorandum of Association Rules of 1981 in the Punjab Rules of Business of the Bar Association Rules, 1981 required a "cross mark" against the name of a favorite candidate, did not mean that if a voter Has \
famous high court advocate from Kachhi/Bolan lawyer
