ABDUL GHANI versus MEMBER (CONSOLIDATION), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB; LAHORE
West Pakistan Consolidation of Holding Ordinance 1960 Section 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Request Stabilization Scheme, Most land owners were not satisfied with Consolidation Scheme Additional Commissioner (Stability) canceled the scheme and dismissed the case. Shipped to Prior to the dismissal of the Board of Revenue, the Consolidation Officer was not incensed at the request for review as well as the issue by which the Board of Revenue rejected the order of the Additional Commissioner and restored the scheme, under the self-amended jurisdiction. To note that two judicial orders were reviewed by the board, one amendment was approved in the jurisdiction and the other approved in the jurisdiction of the review, such powers were adopted by the West Pakistan Consolidation of Holding Ordinance, 1960. Was not possessed by the Board of Revenue under section 13 of the Act, and during the approval of the order. The Board reversed the jurisdiction and such order was not sustained in law, the order of the exercise of jurisdiction amended by the Board of Revenue was illegal and had no legal effect.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Peshawar lawyer