Find a Lawyer

MUSLIM GUL versus MIR BADSHAH

Section 115 review trial court did not dismiss the case and the appeal court dismissed the appeal filed by the plaintiff against the decision of the plaintiff in which the plaintiff's counsel for the plaintiff made any Or was unable to identify material misconduct or chronic error, which neither exercised jurisdiction nor enforced its jurisdiction nor was it illegal in its jurisdiction. Worked or with material irregularities, in harmony decisions made by the courts below, by the High Court I can not interfere. The revised request for review on its jurisdiction was excluded due to time constraints and no substance.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013

• AJAB KHAN v. MUHAMMAD RAMZAN 2013 MLD 1493
• SONERI BANK LIMITED v. AZEEM MATCH (PVT.) LTD. 2013 CLD 1504
• FAWAD AHMED v. State 2013 MLD 1509
• NOOR-UL-BASAR v. Mian ADNAN BACHA 2013 CLC 1510
• FAISAL MUNIR v. The STATE through Latif Khan ASI Choki Mayar 2013 PCrLJ 1525
• STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION v. Mst. SHUMILA 2013 CLD 1525
• MUHAMMAD JAMEEL v. Mst. TAHIRA BIBI 2013 CLC 1529
• FASIHUDDIN v. UMAR CHEEMA 2013 MLD 1532

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2013 →

immigration advocates from Morgah lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes