Find a Lawyer

COCA COLA BEVERAGES PAKISTAN LIMITED versus ABDUL HAMEED CHAUDHRY, PROPRIETOR, KHURRAM & CO.

Specific Relief Act 1877 Sections 12, 21, 54 and 56 (f) Specific Performance Enforcement Manufacturers (Appellant) were selling their products only on the basis of sale or purchase to the buyer (respondent), and even if There was no verbal agreement between the parties in this regard, which was terminated by the manufacturers, the buyers of the law, could not be sought for the implementation of such an agreement, with Section 21 of the Special Relief Act, 1877, a study of section 12 In the best case scenario, the buyer can claim damages because of the explanation, the sale / purchase agreement of the goods. Yrqanuny suit for specific performance by the end buyer was not able to read the provisions of section 54. Where the Special Relief Act, 1877, where the treaty was not enforced, there is no question of a permanent injunction if the provisional injunction cannot be approved in the law, the temporary injunction is not a binding participant. Such parties may be allowed to complain against the breach of such agreement, in the event that temporary relief to the buyer may prevent the buyer from disposing of their product to the area. , Which was previously assigned. Buyers famous lower court advocate from Bhakkar lawyer