Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus JAN MUHAMMAD

The Special Relief Act 1877 Section 12 Transfer of Property Act (I82 of I82), for the specific performance of the Section 53 agreement, the suit plaintiff had proved that the defendant, who was his brother, owned half of it in the suit property. Agreed to sell and after acquiring it, the possession of the house under consideration was handed over to him, but the appellate court rejected the trial court's finding that it was a non-registered document. Was a contract of sale, the plaintiff was not admissible in evidence, based on the performance of part of his contract. The defendants were reasonably considered and the plaintiff was on the property of the plaintiff on the equivalent principle contained under Section 53A of the Transfer of Affected Property Act 188, even in the absence of registration of the contract, the defendant was killed by the defendant. Will be entitled to the protection of its possession against. After that, the sale and payment document was proved, the appellate court could not prosecute the plaintiff, only the technical finding of the appellate court was reversed and the high court restored the trial court. online advocate from Washuk lawyer