ZULFIQAR AHMAD versus THE STATE
Articles 514 and 498 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CRPC) were enjoined on the admissibility of interim arrest of the applicant on a bond of enforced homicide ordinance (VII of 1979), section 10 bail. ? Bail in the case of 2 4 2001 until the accused appeared in court on 7 4 2001, but the presiding officer was on leave, the matter was adjourned till 12 4 2001 and the interim bail was extended. The accused did not appear in court. The court, on 12 4 2001, subsequently ruled that the applicant was pressured by the applicant to pay the guarantee that the guarantee would be paid as a result of an agreement between the guarantor and the guarantor. Responsible only for the date on which the bond was executed. The applicant was not responsible for presenting the accused to the court on any subsequent date which the session had approved by the court under which the applicant was directed to submit the bail amount and to review the same in this case. The request for was granted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Goular Khel lawyer