Find a Lawyer

NADIR KHAN versus THE STATE

The Punjab Courts did not mention the details of the plea deal in the pre-trial plaintiff's pre-trial 13th section. The lower courts did not consider it appropriate that the details of the student were not mentioned in the case. That could not be justified simply because the time and place of the pond was in dispute and the names of the witnesses were not specifically disclosed in the plaintiff in which the plaintiff spoke of making the pond. According to section 13 (3) of 1990, the plaintiff's copy of the notice of the student was presented in the evidence which R Neither was no cross examination directed nor was any objection raised by the defendant's decisions and orders. One of the following courts was set aside and the plaintiff's suit was ordered under the circumstances best law firm from Nawab Shah lawyer