MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus THE SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION
Service Tribunals Act 1973 Section 4 Mandatory Service (Armed Forces) Ordinance (XXIV of 1971), Section 9 A special seniority determination law, the former seniority list of public servants, was shown to oppose civil servants but later They were placed on the seniority list. Junior opposing public servants Opposing civil servants, who were later named senior to the civilian list, were taken advantage of by serving in the Army under the Compulsory Service (Armed Forces Ordinance, 1971), Who forced some essential things. Callup Notes Mandatory Service (Armed Forces) Ordinance, 1971, as a special law, served in the Armed Forces had a greater impact on all other laws, rules and regulations that opposed government employees. Which was the minimum length. Services in the Armed Forces will be entitled to the benefits of such services, which will dominate any other law, subordinate legislation, rules and administrative directives in a particular law if one wires such legislation. If there is a complaint against him, he could refer to the appropriate forum for the correction of any wrong, but cannot support any law. To be collectively challenged in entirely different types of operations and especially in relation to terms and conditions of service, the Service Tribunal exercised limited jurisdiction over the proposed terms and conditions and caused the absence of law It was Provisions, rules or administrative directives if the law itself provides an added benefit to certain workers, who
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
