Find a Lawyer

ABDUL RASHID versus ABDUL GHAFFAR

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Islamic Sentencing Laws (Enforcement) Act 1974 Section 3/24 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 417 (2A) Appeals filed against the complainant who failed to appear as a witness in court. Written FIR proved. In addition to an FIR with Maher Head Constable, the fatal injury to the Inquiry Report and the Injury Sheet was allegedly caused by the incapacity of a 12-bore gun and a police officer, who prepared it as a prosecution witness, Not presenting the story of the prosecution was the result of a political rivalry between the suspects whose trial was called the motive. There is no contradictory contradiction between the ocular evidence and the medical evidence, as it is not possible for eyewitnesses to give the exact distance from which the fire was shot, always with the possibility of a few feet or years of error even otherwise, reliable ocular. The testimony could not be dismissed simply because of some variations. The prosecution testified and at the time of the injury the distance between the assailant and the victim's medical evidence was found to have confiscated the gun, the mere connection of the recovery witnesses was not the basis for dismissing his testimony. Likewise, the suspected firearm injury was caused by a 12-bore gun, not by a rifle or any other firearm like a pistol. From the victims, the prosecution's version was not discovered by medical evidence, but rather that medical evidence was supported, regardless of the evidence that had no basis in the relationship. The evidence was recovered, as the prosecution stated. Est famous lower court advocate from North Wazirstan lawyer