HAJI MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MILLS LTD versus SAEED AHMED
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii) and 25 A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section 2 (i) and Section O 15 (3) (c) (e) Complaints related complaints. Forman was dismissed from the job after retaining his position as an employee and after inquiring against him on charges of damaging the employer and the employee's monthly salary of 8000 on unauthorized absence. There was money and that was the salary sheet of the employees and his attendance register was different from the workers as he was signing a separate attendance register with the employees. The employee claimed that he was a worker because he was repairing machines. Worked, there is no doubt that manual labor is involved, but the formula for that employee No, such manual workers were only accidental employees, in the circumstances of the Labor Court cannot be placed in the order category, whereby complaints filed by the employees were allowed along with the rehabilitation instructions. , The payment for the full refund was set aside
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Chaman lawyer