ASHRAF ALI versus STATE
Neither witnesses saw the testimony of the Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34 testimony nor did they know that the witness, the complainant's son, on whom the whole matter depended, was not examined by the prosecution's identity parade. Held after an unidentified delay made, the possibility of witnesses being shown cannot be ruled out even though the identity parade was monitored by an unqualified person, which was recorded by witnesses. There was no role played by the accused. Because of this he had lost his sanctity, his recovery machine was prepared at the police station, the motive for the incident was not proven by the prosecution on record, which is mysteriously reduced, evidence against the accused. The identity was in the form of a parade that was the weakest. On the nature of the charges, the accused were given the benefit of the doubt and they were acquitted in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Sagri lawyer