Find a Lawyer

MAPLE LEAF COMPANY versus ISLAMABAD ELECTRICITY SUPPLY

Sections 3, 7, 45 and 46 of the Generation, Transmission and Distribution of Power Act 1997, National Energy Power Regulatory Authority Licensing (Distribution) Rules, 1999, R3 Power Act (IX of 1910), Section 28 Notification to the Punjab Government of any US (P) (I&P) 4 35/95, 31 1995 12 1995 Government of Punjab Notification Number US (P) (I&P) 4 37/95, Dated 22 2 1999 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition License to the Applicant The petitioner's allegation of the production and distribution of electricity from the given provincial government was that Wapda had illegally taken over his business, though the applicant had a license which was not allowed This area was allotted for the purpose of supply / distribution. The applicant made a national request. Under the new rules for generating electricity and permitting power, the Electric Power Regulatory Authority had not yet decided this request while Watershed The Power Development Authority and the petitioner continued to discuss the question of Lux Standage for supplying electricity to some consumers, but said that WAPDA was justifying its operations where it could be supplied by the parties. In fact, the inquiry was a question of the High Court, in view of the circumstances and economic policies of the government, which aims to increase economic activity in the country to increase the wealth of the people and end the inertia, observed that government agencies like Napra. It should have clear policies and apparatus to engage in such disputes so that they are resolved immediately and economic activity is avoided by the High Court, therefore, the matter should be directed to Nipra. Referred to with when you need a advocate from Dera Murad Jamali lawyer