SYED ABDUL QAYYUM versus GENERAL, MANAGER, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS
Limit of Appeal for Service Tribunals Act 1973 Section 4 Qualifications In the 1987 when a civil servant was ordered to assume the role of high office, the public servant did not provoke him on time, though a The interim application was moved by him in 1988 but no legal action was taken by him and service appeal was not filed under the law. Subsequent requests were not lawful and did not provide any fresh cause for action for extension of the boundaries. Their own pay scale ended in 1992 against the high office, when public servants were promoted to B17, though on the basis of a charge, such a government employee was required to file a service appeal to approve the salary. Provided a new opportunity for He had been working for about 5 years, but to no avail, and he continued to work against the post on a standing charge, raising the whole issue of salary demand for the post since 1987 and After a 10-year hiatus due to previous or actual cause of action, 1991 was the maximum time taken. The constitution did not count in days and months, but in the case of a public servant, the whole decade of law was passed without provocation, so the appeal made by a public servant was timely stopped and disqualified. Was.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
