Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SAEED versus THE STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 Oaths Act (X of 1873), the complainant and the police officer appreciating the testimony of Section 13 evidence were witnesses to the recovery and there was no reason to deny that the prosecution had taken all formal proceedings to substantiate the post-mortem report. And thus the wounds on the deceased person were proved to be irregular in recording the statements of the prosecution witnesses with strong affirmation, nor were they identified or not on the oath of the High Court. Nor was anyone objected to by him in the 1990 case. And the trial was not to be decided after ten years simply because of the irregularity of the oath administration by the trial court, which was treatable under section 13 of the Oath to the Act, 1873, which resided in the victim's home. The testimony of the witness and the events described by him was straightforward, convincing and reliable, which was fully confirmed by the medical evidence, according to the evidence, the number of casualties, the nature of the injuries and the time of the injury immediately. A knife was recovered from the accused, according to reports from a chemical examiner who found that the suspect had been stabbed in human blood. The accused was charged and his statement cannot be relied solely on account of his close relations with the deceased and there was no question of retaliation and the conviction of the accused remained in the circumstances. Was placed online advocate from Balakot lawyer