GHULAM FATIMA versus IMDAD HUSSAIN
Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 Section 21 and 23 Litigation Act (IX of 1908), Section 14 Pre-discrimination Case Suit Failure to exclude the trial period without court having jurisdiction Failure to submit the time (amount of time) Factual discovery by the courts below the technical error was filed by the trial court effect suit in the court of the Senior Civil Judge on 30 6 1977 and appearing in the case. In view of the cost of the suit, it was submitted after the Civil Judge First Class Trial followed by the Civil Court on the basis of net profit. School fees and the scope of the assessed value of the suit for the purpose of the hearing was sent to trial by judge and plaintiff was ultimately returned. 5 6 1978, which was presented in the court of competent jurisdiction on the same day, initially when the plaintiff was presented in the court of the senior civil judge, it was within time and in such cases it was decided that the forum In assigning a case, the error was considered a mere technical error when only time was wasted in the forum for lack of litigation, when all three courts had agreed. That the jurisdictional error was caused by a technical error for which the defendants were not convicted, where the harmony of the three courts, finding that the matter was beyond the jurisdiction of the civil judge, was approved by Due to a good iency of judicial fees for submission of order dated 5th cannot result in penalties for dismissal of the plaintiff, the court in the judgment passed by the High Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Mansehra lawyer