MUHAMMAD SALEEM versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE
Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/452/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Article 199 Constitutional Petition Re-investigation was ordered after submission of challan to the court The complainant took the first opportunity after appearing before the Investigating Officer. And secondly, when the verdict was brought against him, he chose to file a constitutional petition to re-investigate the order as illegal and illegal. At the same time, the two treatment could not be taken advantage of The indictment failed to convict one of the accused again in the investigation. Affect the case because the challan was already presented in the Sessions Court trial court, yet the challan was not obliged to charge under section 2222 PP, PPC which was the result of the second inquiry. And was given the option to frame the charge. Section 302, PPC trial court was obliged to look at the evidence which was to be presented along with the facts and circumstances before the accused and then to submit the challan by the police later. The tire was not obliged to charge under the supply of tires, therefore, it would not materially affect the complainant in the trial. Prior to the Sessions Court, the Investigation Officer was not charged with any illegal person, who legally performed his duties after his assignment, and it was for the trial court that he Disagree with the results or the police were unable to investigate the matter even after submitting the challan in court, the constitutional application was exceeded accordingly.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Mehrab Pur lawyer