COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX versus MADURA COATS LTD.
Business Expenses The Company does not apply for rules for the purposes of Sections 40 (c) and 40A (5) for the purposes of Sections 40 (c) and 40A (5). Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Sections 40 (c) and 40A (5) of Indian Income Tax Rules, 1962, R3 [CITV Britannia Industries Company Limited (1982) 135 ITR 35 (Cal) CIT V Notchim Plastics Limited (1989) 179 ITR 196 (P&H) and Geoffrey Manners & Company Limited v CIT (1996) 221 ITR 695 (Boom) not agreed]
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Parachinar lawyer
