Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX versus MADURA COATS LTD.


Business Expenses The Company does not apply for rules for the purposes of Sections 40 (c) and 40A (5) for the purposes of Sections 40 (c) and 40A (5). Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Sections 40 (c) and 40A (5) of Indian Income Tax Rules, 1962, R3 [CITV Britannia Industries Company Limited (1982) 135 ITR 35 (Cal) CIT V Notchim Plastics Limited (1989) 179 ITR 196 (P&H) and Geoffrey Manners & Company Limited v CIT (1996) 221 ITR 695 (Boom) not agreed]

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocates from FR Bannu / Lakki lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.