Find a Lawyer

ABDUL HAMID SIDYDIQUI versus BOARD OF DIRECTORS, AKLASC,

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants Act 1976 Section 23 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants (Qualification and Discipline) Rules, 1977, RR 5, 6, 7 and 8 AJ&K Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1974, Section 30 Azad Jammu. The writ petition regarding the strengthening of the section petition44 writ petition was resisted on the basis that the applicant filed a section of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1974 Authority. Under 30, he was acting under the supervision of an alternate before the Labor Court, which is a legal corporation. By transferring the employees of the corporation, the employees of the corporation were performing their duties in relation to the affairs of the state in accordance with section 44 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act 1974. The Kashmir Civil Servants Act, 1976 and the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants (Qualifications and Discipline) Roll, ie, in 1977, its board of directors applied to the employees of the corporation, not to be a worker or worker of the corporation. And Kashmir Industrial was not entitled to medical treatment under the Labor Court after a lion ordinance, 1974. top civil advocates from Rahwali lawyer